Google’s initial lack of a social network was not a disadvantage, but rather a strategic move. The company’s primary focus has always been to organise the world’s information, not to compete in the social media space. Google’s search engine is the main tool for this, cataloguing and connecting the world’s digital content, including social media posts from platforms like Facebook and Twitter.
Despite the rise of social media, Google remains the dominant force in online advertising. With its advertising revenue exceeding that of all social media sites combined, Google has proven that it doesn’t need a social network to succeed. Instead, it has leveraged the power of its search engine to gather data and target ads more effectively.
Google’s approach to social networking has been through integration, not competition. Features such as Google+ and Google Now are designed to enhance user experience, not to rival Facebook or Twitter. This strategy has allowed Google to maintain its position as the world’s leading search engine, whilst also benefiting from the growth of social media.
In essence, Google has won by focusing on its core mission, whilst cleverly utilising the social media boom to its advantage. It has demonstrated that success in the digital age doesn’t necessarily mean owning a social network, but rather understanding and harnessing the power of information.
Go to source article: http://battellemedia.com/archives/2014/04/google-won-or-why-google-never-needed-a-social-network.php