Static site generators (SSGs) are gaining popularity, offering a streamlined approach to web development. Jekyll, Hugo, and Next.js are notable examples, providing benefits like improved performance, security, and cost-effectiveness. SSGs transform content, typically written in markdown, into a static website, eliminating the need for databases or server-side rendering. This process reduces the risk of server-side attacks, enhances site speed, and lowers hosting costs.
Despite these advantages, SSGs have limitations. They are less suitable for dynamic content or sites requiring user interaction, such as e-commerce platforms or social networks. Additionally, they may pose challenges for non-technical users, as they often require command-line interface familiarity.
The rising trend of Jamstack, an architecture designed to make the web faster, is further promoting the use of SSGs. Jamstack stands for JavaScript, APIs, and Markup, and it encourages pre-rendering files and serving them directly from a CDN. This approach aligns with the principles of SSGs, making them a crucial part of the Jamstack ecosystem.
Thus, while SSGs are not a one-size-fits-all solution, they offer significant benefits for specific use cases. Their growth is likely to continue, driven by the broader adoption of the Jamstack architecture.
Go to source article: https://redmonk.com/rstephens/2020/05/18/static-site-generators/