Technology is inherently political in nature, with its impact on society and the economy. It has a transformative effect, creating winners and losers, and can either uphold or disrupt the status quo. Politics, on the other hand, is about mediating these differences and managing change. Both are intertwined, affecting each other in profound ways.

Aggregators, like Facebook and Google, have immense power due to their control over distribution. They can influence public opinion and shape political discourse. Yet, they lack accountability and transparency, often leading to a concentration of power and wealth. This raises serious questions about democracy and equality.

To address these issues, a new politics for technology is needed. It should focus on decentralising power, promoting competition, and ensuring transparency. This includes regulating aggregators, fostering innovation, and protecting individual rights.

A politics for technology should also consider the societal implications of technological advancement. This involves understanding its impact on jobs, income inequality, and social cohesion. It should aim to create a fair and inclusive society where technology benefits all, not just a few.

In essence, a politics for technology is about balancing the benefits of technological innovation with the need for social justice and democratic governance. It is about shaping a future where technology serves the common good.

Go to source article: