Agile methodologies present ethical dilemmas when it comes to decision distribution. Drawing parallels with the Trojan War, the power dynamics within an Agile team can create conflicts and ethical issues. The Agile approach, which advocates for collective decision-making, can inadvertently lead to ‘tyranny of the majority’, where the majority’s views override the minority’s. This can result in ethical breaches, as the minority’s opinions are disregarded, potentially leading to wrong decisions.
The concept of ‘wisdom of the crowd’ is also questioned. Despite its appeal, it can lead to groupthink, where the desire for harmony leads to suboptimal decisions. Agile’s emphasis on team consensus can inadvertently promote this, stifling individual creativity and innovation.
Moreover, the Agile framework doesn’t necessarily mean equal decision distribution. Hierarchies can still exist, with certain team members wielding more influence. This can result in a skewed decision-making process, further exacerbating ethical issues.
To navigate these dilemmas, Agile teams need to foster an environment where all voices are heard and valued. They also need to critically evaluate decisions, avoiding groupthink and promoting diversity of thought. Lastly, Agile teams must ensure that decision-making power is truly distributed, avoiding hidden hierarchies.
Go to source article: https://medium.com/columbus-egg/agiles-ethical-dilemma-decision-distribution-and-the-trojan-war-36306b178fee