The Scaled Agile Framework for Enterprise (SAFe) is an increasingly popular method for managing large-scale software development projects. However, it’s not without its critics who argue that it’s more about control and less about Agile principles. They claim it’s an ‘unholy incarnation of darkness,’ a manipulative tool that promotes a top-down approach, disregarding the original Agile ethos of self-organising, empowered teams.
Critics argue that SAFe is a means for management to maintain control, rather than empowering teams. It’s seen as a way to appease executives who want to appear progressive without relinquishing control, leading to a pseudo-Agile environment. The framework is also criticised for its complexity, with detractors arguing it’s excessively complicated and bureaucratic.
Furthermore, SAFe’s focus on predictability and planning is seen as contradictory to the Agile principle of embracing change. Critics believe this hampers innovation and adaptability. They also argue that SAFe’s emphasis on synchronisation and coordination can lead to a ‘lowest common denominator’ approach, stifling individual team creativity and agility.
Despite the criticism, SAFe is still widely used, with proponents arguing it provides a practical framework for large organisations transitioning to Agile. However, the debate continues, with critics arguing that it’s a top-down, control-oriented approach that undermines the Agile principles it purports to uphold.
Go to source article: https://medium.com/@seandexter1/beware-safe-the-scaled-agile-framework-for-enterprise-an-unholy-incarnation-of-darkness-bf6819f6943f