Are we on the brink of debunking Moravec’s Paradox? In the 1980s, AI and robotics researcher Hans Moravec highlighted a counterintuitive aspect of AI: tasks requiring high-level reasoning – like chess or Go – are easier for AI to master than basic sensory and motor skills – such as walking or identifying your mom’s face – which humans find instinctive. Adding complexity, these “simpler” skills actually demand much more computational power. This insight sheds light on the complexity of replicating human-like perception and dexterity, outcomes of millions of years of evolution, as opposed to logical reasoning, a more recent development. In today’s AI and ML landscape, this paradox underscores the challenges in creating robots and AI systems capable of seamlessly navigating and interacting with the physical world.
Go to Source
