A recent debate has emerged, suggesting that law and engineering should merge to create a new discipline. This proposal, spearheaded by Edward W. Felten, a computer science professor and deputy U.S. chief technology officer, argues that society needs experts who can understand both the technological and legal implications of the digital age. Felten believes that a new generation of professionals, trained in both law and engineering, could bridge the gap between these two fields.
The proposal has received mixed reactions. Supporters argue that the merger could create a new breed of professionals who can navigate the complex landscape of tech law, such as data privacy and intellectual property rights. Critics, however, warn that the merger could dilute the distinctiveness of both disciplines, and that it may be more effective to encourage collaboration between the two fields rather than merging them.
Despite the controversy, some universities have already introduced interdisciplinary programmes that combine law and engineering. Stanford University, for instance, offers a joint degree in law and computer science. The university believes that such programmes can produce graduates who are well-equipped to tackle the challenges of the digital age.
Ultimately, whether law and engineering should merge is still a matter of debate. What is clear, though, is that the digital age requires professionals who can navigate both the technical and legal landscapes.
Go to source article: http://chronicle.com/article/LawEngineering-Should/236296