Rendanheyi and Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) are two distinct models for organisational structure and operations. Rendanheyi, a Chinese concept, is an amalgamation of two terms: ‘Ren’ meaning ‘person’ and ‘Dan’ meaning ‘single unit’. ‘Heyi’ denotes the integration of these units. This model emphasises the importance of employees as individual business units, promoting entrepreneurship and innovation.
On the other hand, SAFe is a popular framework for implementing agile practices at an enterprise level. Its core principles are derived from Agile, Lean, and DevOps. SAFe promotes alignment, collaboration, and delivery across large numbers of agile teams.
Despite their differences, both models share a common goal of creating more responsive, adaptable, and customer-centric organisations. They both advocate for decentralisation, autonomy, and flexibility. However, their approach to achieving these goals varies. While Rendanheyi focuses on individual entrepreneurial spirit, SAFe relies on coordination and collaboration among teams.
In terms of implementation, Rendanheyi may pose challenges due to its radical departure from traditional organisational structures. SAFe, while easier to implement, may struggle with bureaucracy and slow decision-making due to its focus on alignment and collaboration.
Ultimately, the choice between Rendanheyi and SAFe depends on the specific needs and context of the organisation. Both models offer valuable insights into how organisations can become more agile, innovative, and customer-focused.
Go to source article: https://www.boundaryless.io/blog/rendanheyi-and-safe-a-side-by-side-comparison/