Automation is increasingly prevalent in the corporate world, and some argue it could even replace the role of a CEO. Software like UiPath and Automation Anywhere are already performing tasks traditionally done by lower-level employees. Some experts, like futurist Martin Ford, suggest that automation could take over the decision-making process in businesses, using algorithms to make decisions instead of human CEOs.
However, there are also arguments against this idea. CEOs do more than just make decisions; they also set the vision for a company, inspire staff, and build relationships with stakeholders – tasks that are challenging to automate. Additionally, algorithms can be biased, as they are programmed by humans who have their own biases.
In terms of cost, automating a CEO could be cheaper, as the average CEO in the US makes $15.6m a year. But this doesn’t account for the potential cost of mistakes made by an algorithm, which could be financially devastating.
In conclusion, while automation is making strides in the corporate world, the replacement of a CEO by an algorithm is not a simple matter and involves a complex balance of benefits and risks.
Go to source article: https://thehustle.co/should-we-automate-the-ceo-2/