Service meshes are a crucial part of modern microservices architecture, offering a host of benefits including increased observability, improved reliability, and enhanced security. They act as a dedicated infrastructure layer, handling a high volume of network-based interprocess communication among services.
Despite their advantages, service meshes aren’t always necessary. For simpler applications with a small number of services, the overhead of managing a service mesh may outweigh its benefits. In such cases, the traditional library approach can serve well.
When deciding whether to implement a service mesh, consider factors such as the number of services, the complexity of the system, and the team’s expertise in managing service meshes. If the system has more than 10 services, or if the team is spending significant time on network-related code, a service mesh might be beneficial.
Istio and Linkerd are popular service mesh options. Istio offers a comprehensive set of features but can be complex to manage. Linkerd is simpler and easier to use, but offers fewer features.
In conclusion, while service meshes offer significant benefits for managing microservices, they aren’t always the best solution. It’s crucial to consider the specific needs and capabilities of the system and team before deciding to implement a service mesh.
Go to source article: https://blog.runx.dev/unraveling-service-meshes-when-and-why-do-you-need-them-ceba38263af2