Meetings are often seen as unproductive, and this perception may be attributed to several factors. Firstly, meetings tend to be dominated by extroverts, who may not necessarily provide the most valuable insights. Secondly, they can be perceived as a platform for demonstrating competence rather than solving problems. Thirdly, meetings often lack a clear agenda, leading to unstructured discussions.
Another critical issue is the ‘Parkinson’s Law of Triviality’ — the tendency to focus on minor, easily comprehensible issues rather than tackling complex problems. A related issue is the ‘Law of Group Polarisation’ — the tendency for group discussions to lead to more extreme positions.
Moreover, the effectiveness of a meeting can be undermined by ‘social loafing’, where individuals contribute less effort in a group setting than they would individually. Lastly, the ‘Curse of Knowledge’ can come into play, where experts underestimate the difficulty others may have in understanding complex topics.
To improve meetings, it’s suggested to set a clear agenda, limit the number of participants, encourage diversity of thought, and ensure everyone is prepared. Additionally, using a skilled facilitator can help keep discussions on track and productive.
Go to source article: https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2022/01/why-are-meetings-so-bad.html