WikiLeaks’ release of confidential American diplomatic cables in 2010 sparked a global media frenzy. The leaks, containing 251,287 cables, were a treasure trove of inside information, revealing the inner workings of international diplomacy. The release sparked a debate about the ethics of transparency, with some arguing that the public has a right to know, while others contended that such revelations could endanger lives and damage diplomatic relations.
The media’s handling of the leaks was also scrutinised. Several outlets, including The Guardian, The New York Times, Der Spiegel, Le Monde, and El País, were given early access to the cables. They were able to sift through the data, cherry-pick the most newsworthy items, and prepare their coverage in advance. This led to accusations of media bias and manipulation, as well as concerns about the potential for misinformation.
In response to the leaks, the U.S. government launched a crackdown on whistleblowing, resulting in the arrest and trial of Chelsea Manning, a former U.S. Army intelligence analyst who provided the cables to WikiLeaks. The case highlighted the risks faced by whistleblowers and the potential consequences of leaking classified information. Meanwhile, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange sought asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, sparking a lengthy legal and diplomatic saga.
The WikiLeaks saga underscored the power of information in the digital age, the complexities of international diplomacy, and the ongoing debate over transparency versus security. It also raised questions about the role of the media in shaping public perception, the ethics of whistleblowing, and the limits of government secrecy.
Go to source article: http://madebymany.co.uk/wikileaks-news-and-the-stories-within-the-story-004279